Topic

Copyright

  • Mexico now requires performers' consent, and a contract, before anyone clones their voice with AI

    Mexico changed its Federal Copyright Law and Federal Labor Law in May 2026. A performer's voice and image are now protected against AI clones, a payment for one use no longer counts as consent to others, and work contracts must set the terms and pay for any AI use. This is already law, not a bill, but the exceptions are worded more loosely than the headlines suggest.

    Artist rightsvia Diario Oficial de la Federación

  • Denmark's deepfake bill would make whoever posts a voice clone prove they had consent

    Denmark's culture minister tabled bill L 49 on 8 Oct 2026. It would bar sharing realistic digital imitations of a person's voice, face or other features, or of a performer's performance, without consent, from 1 Jan 2027. It is not law yet. The detail that matters most for singers is in the explanatory notes: the person who publishes the imitation has to prove consent.

    Artist rightsvia Folketingstidende (Danish Parliament)

  • What copyright protects in a song, and what it doesn't: a guide for the AI 'sounds like' era

    Read together, the Katy Perry, Ed Sheeran and Mariah Carey cases draw a clear line in US law: a melody and an original selection and arrangement of elements can be owned, while scales, common chord progressions, rhythms and genre clichés can't. Style isn't copyrightable either. For producers working with reference tracks and AI, that makes the singer's voice a bigger risk than the vibe.

    Artist rightsvia US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Subscribe to We are the music makers

One email a week: the music-tech and AI-in-music news that mattered, and what we think about it.

Sign-ups open soon.