Topic

Ai-training

What the EU AI Act means for musicians: labels, training summaries, opt-outs and dates
The EU AI Act does three things a musician should know about: it makes general-purpose AI providers keep a copyright policy and publish a summary of their training content, it requires deepfake audio to be disclosed and AI output to carry machine-readable marks, and it points rightsholders to the EU text-and-data-mining opt-out. This guide sets out what each rule says, when it applies, and what it does not do, from the regulation text and European Commission pages read on 24 Oct 2026.
25 Oct 2026Workflows
How to opt your music out of AI training: what EU law asks for, and what each signal actually controls
EU law lets you reserve your music from commercial text and data mining, but only if you say so in a way a machine can read. Here is what the law says, what robots.txt, TDMRep and written notices each do, where they fall short, and the order we would set them up in.
24 Oct 2026Workflows
Training-data licensing explained: who gets paid when AI learns from music
So far, every deal that pays for training AI on music runs through an intermediary (a label, publisher, distributor, collecting society or sample marketplace), and almost none publishes a rate. Here is how the four deal structures work, what the law says in the EU, UK, US and India as of 23 Oct 2026, and what an independent artist can actually claim.
23 Oct 2026Workflows
Arooj Aftab's two-payment rule: pay artists when AI trains on them, and every time it uses what it learned
The Grammy-winning singer says musicians are owed twice, once for training and again for every new track an AI makes from what it learned. That goes further than the union statement she was resharing, and further than CISAC's president, but one collective licence in Sweden already pays at both points.
23 Oct 2026AIvia United Musicians and Allied Workers
Australia is the AI copyright outlier, and the world's music publishers are warning it
The International Confederation of Music Publishers says 62 countries have weighed loosening copyright for AI training and Australia now looks like the only one still considering it. It says Gemini can reproduce lyrics by Kylie Minogue, G-Flip and Nick Cave. A parliamentary committee is due to report by 30 November, so Australian artists have weeks to be heard.
19 Oct 2026Artist rightsvia Guardian Australia

What the EU AI Act means for musicians: labels, training summaries, opt-outs and dates

How to opt your music out of AI training: what EU law asks for, and what each signal actually controls

Training-data licensing explained: who gets paid when AI learns from music

Arooj Aftab's two-payment rule: pay artists when AI trains on them, and every time it uses what it learned

Australia is the AI copyright outlier, and the world's music publishers are warning it

Subscribe to We are the music makers