News

The news that matters in music tech and AI in music, with what it means for producers.
  • Merch commission explained: who takes a cut, the 700-plus venues that take nothing, and how to negotiate

    Some venues take 25% or more of an artist's gross merch sales, sometimes with VAT on top. The Featured Artists Coalition says more than 700 UK venues charging nothing have joined its 100% Venues directory. Most grassroots rooms never charged, though, so the real fight is at bigger and corporate venues, and the best tool an artist has there is a rate agreed in writing before the show.

    Industryvia Featured Artists Coalition

  • Suno's custom models go shared. Who owns a model trained on your catalogue?

    Suno now lets teams share song libraries in Workspaces and lets Premier users share custom models trained on their own uploads, a week after Studio got tighter timing, clip stretching and fade curves. The tools point towards a collaborative studio. Suno's terms say nothing about who owns a shared model or the songs made with it.

    AIvia Suno

  • HOLODRIFT or Grainwerk? Two new granular instruments, and which one to buy at each budget

    Blinksonic's HOLODRIFT (€119 launch price until 30 October, then €159) and Decent Samples' Grainwerk ($29 on sale, $59 list) both turn audio into texture. They are not the same tier. Grainwerk is the cheap, light, Linux-friendly way in. HOLODRIFT is a heavier performance instrument built around morphing between eight sources.

    Releasesvia Blinksonic

  • Two vintage-synth plugins, two ways to sell the past: Audio Blast's V10F and Ebbandflow's deCADE

    Audio Blast's V10F takes its cue from the Kawai 100F, the monosynth Vince Clarke had in early Depeche Mode, and launched at €77. Ebbandflow's deCADE packs 127 captured sounds from a dozen unnamed '80s synths into one sample-based instrument. One sells a synth's history and the other sells its sound, and buyers should know which one they're paying for.

    Releasesvia Audio Blast

  • YouTube Music now labels AI songs: what 'Fully', 'Partly' and 'No Gen AI' mean for you

    YouTube Music began labelling AI-generated songs on its player on 14 Oct 2026, and the labels are coming to the main YouTube app. Partners declare Fully, Partly or No Gen AI, and YouTube's own detection fills the gaps. Here is how to declare, where the lines fall, and how it compares with Spotify's AI Credits.

    AIvia YouTube Official Blog

  • Behringer's JN-80 is shipping: an eight-voice Juno-60 clone with a full keyboard

    Behringer's JN-80, an analog Juno-60 recreation with eight voices, 49 keys and a BBD chorus, is now reaching buyers at about \$569 outside the US. It undercuts Roland's own Juno revivals on keys and voices, but Behringer's own spec sheet contradicts itself on memory and is vague about aftertouch.

    Releasesvia Behringer

  • SoundCloud and Moises link up: pull a track out, split it, master it, publish it back

    SoundCloud artists can now bring their tracks into Moises for stem separation, mixing, mastering, real-time collaboration and help from its "Moi" assistant, then publish the result straight back to SoundCloud. The loop is convenient, but the announcement leaves eligibility, pricing and the labelling of AI-generated parts undefined.

    Industryvia Moises

  • The AI music war becomes a data war: Suno subpoenas the MLC, the labels subpoena DistroKid

    In the same week, Suno asked a Nashville court to force the MLC to hand over years of streaming data, and UMG and Sony asked a Manhattan court to force DistroKid to hand over its AI-detection numbers. Both sides want the data that will decide whether AI music has harmed the market. The artists whose plays and uploads fill those tables can't see any of it.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court, Southern District of New York (via Music Business Worldwide)

  • Suno admits it kept the training recordings, and v6 learned from its users' creations

    In its answer to Universal and Sony's second lawsuit, Suno admits it has not deleted all the recordings it trained on, and repeats that v6 learned from "creations and preference signals" from its community. That makes Suno's own users part of the training pipeline the labels call laundering, under a licence they can't take back.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court for the District of Massachusetts (via Music Business Worldwide)

  • How distributors decide your song is "AI", and what to do when they get it wrong

    A labels' court filing shows DistroKid tests uploads with an undisclosed third-party "prediction model" and has made statements about false positives, none of it published for artists. Here is what is known about distributor AI detection, what you control, and how to protect a release that gets misjudged.

    Industryvia US District Court, Southern District of New York (via Music Business Worldwide)

  • UMG licenses TYGER, an app that reshapes songs around your gameplay

    Universal Music Group is the first major music company to license TYGER, a music app for gamers that adapts licensed recordings to live gameplay. It isn't a song generator, and it could be a new income line. But nobody has said whether artists will be paid like sync or like a stream, or whether they get a say in how their songs are reshaped.

    Industryvia TYGER

  • India's AI-music rules: courts protect famous singers' voices while the copyright plan stalls

    Bombay High Court orders have shielded Arijit Singh and Asha Bhosle from AI voice clones, but the government committee drafting India's AI-copyright rules has not met since June, and its plan would let AI firms train on recordings without permission. Famous voices have a remedy; everyone else is waiting.

    Artist rightsvia Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT)

  • Concord v. Anthropic: 120,000 lyric prompts and the first AI fair-use summary-judgment hearing since Bartz and Kadrey

    Music publishers and Anthropic argued cross-motions for summary judgment over Claude and song lyrics on 21 Oct 2026, with no ruling yet. The publishers are testing "market dilution", the theory that AI-written lyrics compete with human songwriters, which one 2025 ruling dismissed and another said could win.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court, N.D. Cal. (via CourtListener)

  • Spotify hits 306 million subscribers and says AI agents will make it stronger. What artists should ask

    Spotify ended Q3 2026 with 306 million Premium subscribers and 788 million monthly users, and its co-CEO pitched it as a winner of the "agentic age". As listening moves into AI agents and conversations, artists have little view of how they get picked, and the the Universal and Warner deals reaching their two-year mark in early 2027 are the moment to ask.

    Industryvia Spotify Technology S.A.

  • Chappell Roan keeps paying for what she asked labels to pay for

    Chappell Roan's two Super Graphic Spectacular shows at LA's Shrine Auditorium on 21 and 22 October raise money for her Midwest Princess Project. Twenty months after she told labels at the Grammys to give developing artists a living wage and health insurance, artists are still the ones writing the cheques.

    Industryvia Chappell Roan (official site)

  • Accused, unaware, unrepentant: three AI music-video stories in one week

    Fontaines D.C. say a VFX team used AI on "Marianne" without telling them, their label or management. Olivia Rodrigo's art team posted hand-drawn work to answer AI claims, and K.K. Downing defends an AI recreation of his younger self. Artists now carry the reputational risk of supply-chain choices they often never see.

    AIvia Los Angeles Times

  • Reservoir sues Suno and Anthropic, and uses Suno's own licensing deals as evidence against it

    Reservoir Media has sued Suno over 1,050 songs and Anthropic over 853, asking for about $338 million in total. Its sharpest argument is that Suno's deals with Warner, BMG and Believe prove a market for training licences exists. That helps rights owners win; whether it pays songwriters is a separate question.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court, Northern District of California (copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide)

  • Spotify's AI remix tool: who actually consents, the label or the artist?

    Believe and TuneCore became the fourth licensor of Spotify's planned AI covers and remixes add-on on 20 Oct 2026, and the first to describe an artist-level, two-step opt-in. The earlier UMG and Kobalt announcements talk about "participating" artists without saying who makes that choice, and Merlin says artists get a choice without describing how. Price, revenue split and launch date are still undisclosed.

    AIvia Spotify Newsroom

  • Human Made, Human Paid: the musicians' union takes AI to the bargaining table on 3 November

    The American Federation of Musicians wants consent, credit and pay for AI training written into its next contract with Universal, Sony, Warner and Hollywood Records, which covers major-label recordings in the US and Canada. Talks resume on 3 November, while the union's lawsuit over the labels' Suno and Udio deals waits for a ruling.

    Industryvia American Federation of Musicians

  • Australia is the AI copyright outlier, and the world's music publishers are warning it

    The International Confederation of Music Publishers says 62 countries have weighed loosening copyright for AI training and Australia now looks like the only one still considering it. It says Gemini can reproduce lyrics by Kylie Minogue, G-Flip and Nick Cave. A parliamentary committee is due to report by 30 November, so Australian artists have weeks to be heard.

    Artist rightsvia Guardian Australia

  • Apple quietly bought Samplab. Logic Pro's next upgrade may be note-level AI editing

    Apple bought assets from Samplab, a Swiss maker of AI audio-editing software, and hired some of its staff in June. The deal only became public on 19 Oct 2026 through a European Commission filing. Samplab's tools edited single notes inside chords, detected chords and split stems. Apple hasn't announced any Logic Pro feature, but the hire points to AI that edits what you played rather than writing music for you.

    Industryvia Apple Support

  • Musixmatch buys Music Reports and Songdex, and wants AI agents to match your royalties

    The lyrics company has made its first acquisition in 16 years, buying the owner of the Songdex copyright registry, the Blokur matching platform and Cuetrak. Better matching could pay writers money they are owed today. It also puts a large share of the industry's rights data inside one private-equity-backed company.

    Industryvia Music Reports

  • Sia sells half her catalogue to Pophouse: why stars now sell a stake, not the whole thing

    Pophouse, the ABBA-linked investment firm, has bought 50% of Sia's publishing and master rights. TMZ first reported a $180 million price from divorce documents and Rolling Stone says it confirmed the figure, but neither party has disclosed it. A half sale keeps Sia in the room, and we think that is the real product Pophouse is buying.

    Industryvia Reed Smith

  • Vetter v. Resnik stands: songwriters can reclaim worldwide rights in the Fifth Circuit, because the Supreme Court lacked a quorum

    With four justices sitting out, the Supreme Court had no quorum and automatically affirmed the Fifth Circuit's ruling that a US copyright termination recaptures a songwriter's worldwide rights. It is a real win for writers in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, but it sets no national precedent and foreign courts still apply their own law.

    Artist rightsvia Supreme Court of the United States

  • Italy wrote "human authorship" into law: what its AI act means for producers using AI

    Italy's AI law, Law No. 132 of 2025, amended the country's copyright act so that only works of human intellect are protected, including AI-assisted works that are "the result of the author's intellectual work". It also made spreading harmful AI-faked voices a crime. The law doesn't say how much human input is enough, so the evidence a producer keeps becomes the practical safeguard.

    Artist rightsvia Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana

  • Live Nation after the verdict: the fight that matters to artists is over who books the big rooms

    Six months after a jury found Live Nation and Ticketmaster liable for monopolisation, the judge had not ruled, as far as we could find, on throwing out the verdict, and the federal settlement is still under review. A new filing says President Trump briefly appeared at the March meeting where it was agreed. For working artists, ticket fees matter less than whether Live Nation can keep tying its promotion to the venues it controls.

    Artist rightsvia US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division

  • The Living Wage for Musicians Act would pay artists from a streaming fund. A year on, it has not moved

    H.R. 5664 would add a fee of half the subscription price, between $4 and $10, to every music streaming subscription and take 10% of streamers' other music revenue, then pay the money straight to human recording artists, capped at a million streams per track a month. It was referred to the House Judiciary Committee on 30 September 2025, and Congress.gov shows no action since.

    Artist rightsvia U.S. Government Publishing Office

  • AM/FM radio still pays US recording artists nothing, and the American Music Fairness Act has stalled again

    The American Music Fairness Act would make AM and FM stations pay performers and labels for the recordings they play, as satellite and internet radio already must. As of 23 Oct 2026 neither the Senate nor the House bill has gone beyond committee referral, despite a Senate hearing in December 2025. A resolution opposing any new radio fee has more than 230 House cosponsors.

    Artist rightsvia US Government Publishing Office (govinfo)

  • India's labels want streaming services to pay nothing for AI "slop". Who decides what counts?

    Saregama's managing director Vikram Mehra says labels in India and globally are working with the three leading streaming services so that purely AI-generated music gets no share of the royalty pool. The principle protects human artists, but it leaves open who draws the line, how AI-assisted work is treated, and who keeps the money that slop no longer earns.

    Industryvia Deezer Newsroom

  • Apple Music goes live: a London venue, a festival stream, and the tools independent artists can actually use

    Apple Music opened a 600-capacity venue in London, streamed its first festival on video and sells DJ mixes that pay the producers whose tracks appear in them. It has also put concert dates on artist pages and same-day release data in Apple Music for Artists. The venue is for stars. The ticketing and data plumbing is where independent artists can get value, as long as they set it up before release day.

    Industryvia Apple Newsroom

  • The Copyright Office's AI training report is still a draft 17 months on, and its critics are using that

    The US Copyright Office's report on generative AI training, released as a "pre-publication version" on 9 May 2025, has never been finalised. Its view that some training is fair use and some isn't, and that market dilution is real harm, is the closest thing music has to an official US position. Litigants cite it, the Justice Department attacks it, and the two big 2025 rulings didn't cite it at all.

    Artist rightsvia US Copyright Office

  • FTC v. Ticketmaster survives dismissal: the BOTS Act and fee claims head to discovery

    On 28 September 2026 a federal judge in Los Angeles refused to throw out the FTC and seven states' case against Live Nation and Ticketmaster over broker-friendly ticket limits and drip pricing. That isn't a finding that the companies broke the law. It does let the case go ahead on the theory that a ticket platform can be liable under the BOTS Act for reselling tickets brokers got around its limits to buy, and that theory is the part of the ruling artists should care about.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court for the Central District of California (copy hosted by TicketNews)

  • Phonorecords V: what Spotify, Apple and Amazon want to pay songwriters for 2028 to 2032

    Publishers want a 20% headline streaming mechanical rate for 2028 to 2032. Spotify, Apple, Google and Pandora want to keep 15.35%, and Amazon wants it cut to 13.4%. Meanwhile, a deal on CD, vinyl and download rates, struck mostly by labels and their sister publishers, is being challenged by the independent songwriters it left out.

    Industryvia Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress (Federal Register)

  • UMG pushes out top label bosses while it builds a central AI and data team

    Universal Music Group's final round of 2024-planned cost cuts removed the heads of Def Jam, Republic and Polydor and two senior Interscope Geffen A&M A&R executives, while UMG says it is "bringing in new skills and technology". UMG has not tied the cuts to AI, but the people it hired this year are data and machine-learning specialists, and that changes who speaks for an artist inside a major.

    Industryvia Universal Music Group

  • "Heart on My Sleeve", three and a half years on: the fake Drake track that set the terms for AI music

    In April 2023 an anonymous producer called Ghostwriter put out a song with AI voices made to sound like Drake and the Weeknd, and it was gone from the streaming services within days; on YouTube, Universal's claim reportedly rested on a producer tag rather than on the voices. Since then labels have sued AI companies and then licensed them, and platforms have written voice-clone rules. The idea Ghostwriter pitched, licensed voices with a revenue split, is now the business model. It's just not his.

    AIvia Billboard

  • Every platform now labels AI music differently, and the burden lands on artists

    YouTube Music started labelling AI-generated songs on 14 Oct 2026, using what partners declare plus its own detection. Apple Music, Spotify, TIDAL, Deezer and the RIAA/IFPI scheme each draw the line in a different place, so an artist who uses AI for one stem now has to describe it five ways or let a detector decide.

    Industryvia YouTube Official Blog

  • Deezer's AI kill switch is a search filter. Its own numbers say the bigger problem is fraud

    Deezer will let listeners hide fully AI-generated music from search before the end of 2026. Its own figures matter more than the toggle. Deezer receives nearly 90,000 fully AI tracks a day, yet they draw only 1-3% of streams, and up to 85% of those streams in 2025 were fraudulent. For human artists, the fix that counts is in the payout system, not the search bar.

    Industryvia Deezer Newsroom

  • More than 40 UK festivals have fallen in 2026: the independent-festival squeeze

    The Association of Independent Festivals' tracker lists 41 UK festivals cancelled, postponed, paused or closed in 2026, against 43 in all of 2025. Big events sold out fast this summer while the losses fell mostly on smaller festivals, the tier where emerging artists get their festival slots. AIF's main ask, extending a VAT cut on family tickets, would do little for most of them.

    Industryvia Association of Independent Festivals

  • Holly+ gave a voice clone a constitution. The consent tools that followed settled for an opt-out box

    In July 2021 Holly Herndon released Holly+, a voice instrument trained on her isolated vocals, with a plan for token holders to approve official uses and share the money. A year later she and Mat Dryhurst co-founded Spawning, whose "Have I Been Trained?" opt-out became one of the most widely used opt-out tools in AI. The first idea asked permission up front; the second asked artists to object. Five years on, the first is still the better template.

    AIvia Holly Herndon

  • Music teachers on AI: mostly lesson prep, rarely in the classroom

    Three 2026 studies, from Indiana, Australia and Italy, and China, find music teachers using AI mostly behind the desk for planning and paperwork, and drawing a firm line at artistry, authorship and assessment. Here is what they found, what worries teachers, and what good practice looks like.

    AIvia National High School Journal of Science (NHSJS)

  • Mexico now requires performers' consent, and a contract, before anyone clones their voice with AI

    Mexico changed its Federal Copyright Law and Federal Labor Law in May 2026. A performer's voice and image are now protected against AI clones, a payment for one use no longer counts as consent to others, and work contracts must set the terms and pay for any AI use. This is already law, not a bill, but the exceptions are worded more loosely than the headlines suggest.

    Artist rightsvia Diario Oficial de la Federación

  • Suno now runs your concert alerts: what its Songkick move means for artists

    Suno has hired Ticketmaster's Michael Chua to run a new "Live Experiences" team that includes Songkick, whose user data Suno now controls. An AI company that is still being sued by two major labels now owns a map of which human artists fans want to see live, and where those fans are. Artists should know what that data can be used for.

    Industryvia Songkick (operated by Suno Inc.)

  • Digital-replica laws for musicians: what California, New York and Illinois actually require

    California, New York, Illinois and Tennessee are among the US states with AI-era rules on copies of a performer's voice, and they work in different ways. California and New York kill vague replica clauses in contracts, California also requires estate consent for replicas of dead performers, and Illinois makes it unlawful to knowingly distribute an unauthorised replica. Here is what each statute says, where they differ, and a checklist for your next contract.

    Artist rightsvia Office of the Governor of California

  • Denmark's deepfake bill would make whoever posts a voice clone prove they had consent

    Denmark's culture minister tabled bill L 49 on 8 Oct 2026. It would bar sharing realistic digital imitations of a person's voice, face or other features, or of a performer's performance, without consent, from 1 Jan 2027. It is not law yet. The detail that matters most for singers is in the explanatory notes: the person who publishes the imitation has to prove consent.

    Artist rightsvia Folketingstidende (Danish Parliament)

  • Bandcamp's AI ban, nine months on: a good rule with no visible process

    Bandcamp banned music made "wholly or in substantial part" by AI in January. Since then, a project whose bio credited Suno stayed up until a newsroom asked about it, and Boy George's AI-assisted song was pulled with his profile. A human-only store is worth having, but artists need a published standard, notice and an appeal route.

    Industryvia Bandcamp

  • Michael Smith gets 18 months, and the Copyright Office finally asks how streaming fraud works

    Michael Smith, who used AI-generated songs and bot accounts to drain streaming royalty pools, was sentenced to 18 months and ordered to forfeit about 8.09 million dollars. The next day the US Copyright Office published a public inquiry into streaming fraud, with comments due 23 Nov 2026. For artists it is the first official place to put on record what fraud costs them.

    Industryvia U.S. Copyright Office, Federal Register

  • Italy's competition regulator puts Suno's terms of service on trial

    Italy's competition and consumer authority (AGCM) has opened an unfair-terms investigation into Suno, case CV278. It flags six groups of clauses, including a moral-rights waiver, a vague copyright licence, unilateral price and service changes, and US arbitration. Nothing has been found illegal yet, but these are the clauses most creators never read.

    Artist rightsvia Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)

  • Google Flow Music now exports the tools you describe as VST3 and AU plugins

    Since 6 Oct 2026, Google Flow Music lets producers describe an instrument or effect in plain language and load it into their DAW as a VST3 or AU plugin. It is macOS-only, limited to synth and effects processing, and runs inside a Google host plugin, which matters more than the launch framing suggests.

    Releasesvia Google

  • Sony has asked for 260,000 AI deepfakes to be taken down, and indie artists have no Sony

    Sony Music has now asked platforms to remove more than 260,000 AI tracks imitating its artists, up from 135,000 at the end of March. That is roughly 20,000 requests a month, which is a full-time enforcement operation. An independent artist facing the same impersonation has a report form, a distributor and their own spare time.

    Industryvia Spotify for Artists Support

  • Touring Europe after Brexit, 2026: still no deal on visas, cabotage or carnets

    Ten months into 2026, the core rules for a UK band playing the EU are the ones that applied in 2021. Brussels has floated longer short stays for touring artists, MPs have asked for a deal, and a youth scheme is still being negotiated, but none of it changes the 90/180-day clock, the van limits or the carnet. Here is where things stand, and a checklist built only from official guidance.

    Industryvia European Commission

  • What copyright protects in a song, and what it doesn't: a guide for the AI 'sounds like' era

    Read together, the Katy Perry, Ed Sheeran and Mariah Carey cases draw a clear line in US law: a melody and an original selection and arrangement of elements can be owned, while scales, common chord progressions, rhythms and genre clichés can't. Style isn't copyrightable either. For producers working with reference tracks and AI, that makes the singer's voice a bigger risk than the vibe.

    Artist rightsvia US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • Avex takes 85% of S10 Entertainment: a Japanese label group now owns a US artist manager

    Avex has raised its stake in Brandon Silverstein's S10 Entertainment to 85%, trade press report, with a path to full ownership. The real story is the playbook. A Japanese company is buying a US manager's relationships to get its own acts heard abroad, and S10's clients now have a manager owned by a label, publisher and live business.

    Industryvia Avex Inc.

  • Elektron Outbox 8 and Syntakt Twinshot: who needs them and what they cost

    Elektron's $349 Outbox 8 adds eight audio or CV outputs to a groovebox, and free Syntakt firmware has added Twinshot, a two-sample player, plus Outbox 8 support. For a Syntakt owner the pairing fixes the two things the box couldn't do. If you record into a DAW, you can probably skip the breakout box.

    Releasesvia Elektron

  • Suno moves into speech, and voice artists should pay attention

    Suno opened a public beta of Speech on 1 Oct 2026, a model that generates a spoken voice and an original score as one track. It is the company's first speech product since Bark, and it points straight at narration, meditation and voiceover, the steady work that pays many musicians' and voice actors' bills. Suno hasn't said where the voices come from.

    Releasesvia Suno

  • One senator stopped the NO FAKES Act. Here's what artists lose while it waits

    Ted Cruz objected when Marsha Blackburn asked the Senate to pass the NO FAKES Act by unanimous consent on 30 Sep, so the first federal right over your own voice and likeness now waits for a short post-election session. Until then, a cloned singer's options depend on which state they live in.

    Artist rightsvia Congress.gov

  • The Music Modernization Act in 10 minutes: what it fixed, and what it left broken

    The 2018 Music Modernization Act rebuilt US streaming mechanicals, brought pre-1972 recordings into federal law and wrote producer royalties into the statute. It left AM/FM radio untouched, and unclaimed song money still goes out by market share. Here is what each part does for you, with worked examples and a checklist.

    Artist rightsvia U.S. Copyright Office

  • REAPER's quiet 2026: spectral repair, FX containers and dark mode, for $60

    REAPER 7.81 landed on 28 Sep 2026 with experimental dark mode on Windows, the latest of 25 point releases this year that added sample editing, spectral repair and multi-mono FX containers. The licence is still $60 for most independent musicians, with updates through version 8.99.

    Releasesvia Cockos

  • Africa's streaming is growing faster than its royalty collection

    Sub-Saharan Africa's recorded music revenues grew 15.2% in 2025 to $120 million, and digital income grew faster still. But South Africa takes 78.1% of that, collecting societies across the continent took in only €90 million in 2024, and nobody publishes fraud rates for African markets. For African artists the growth is real; the plumbing that turns plays into payments is not keeping up.

    Industryvia IFPI

  • Read the AI clause before you upload: what the SoundCloud terms fight teaches about platform ToS

    In February 2024 SoundCloud added a line to its terms letting uploads "inform, train, develop" AI. When artists noticed in May 2025, it replaced the line with a narrower promise: no training of generative models that "aim to replicate or synthesize" your voice, music or likeness without opt-in. The fix is real, but it is narrower than it sounds. Here is how to read clauses like it.

    Artist rightsvia SoundCloud

  • Publishing deals explained: admin, co-pub and full publishing, and what each costs you

    A publishing deal decides who owns part of your song, who registers it, and for how long. Admin deals leave ownership with you for a fee. Co-pub and full publishing deals trade a share of the copyright for an advance and a team. Here is how the money splits, how long the rights stay away, and why the catalogue sales of 2026 make ownership the part to guard.

    Industryvia ASCAP

  • How much music is actually AI? Qobuz and SIQA's numbers, read carefully

    Qobuz says only 0.38% of its streams come from AI-identified tracks, and it treats 60% of those streams as fraud. A self-selected sample of AI creators charted by SIQA points the other way, towards hybrid human-plus-AI work. Supply is huge, real listening is small, and policy written for "fully AI slop" misses most of the people actually using these tools.

    AIvia Qobuz

  • Spain's official charts set AI rules: substantially human, lawful and disclosed

    Promusicae and AGEDI, which compile Spain's official charts, have adopted IFPI's principles for recordings made with generative AI. A track can chart only if it is substantially human made, made with an authorised AI service and labelled for listeners. None of those terms is defined, and the Spanish announcement mentions no way to appeal.

    AIvia AGEDI

  • Moral rights explained: why an Indian musician can object to a distorted AI remix and most US musicians can't

    Moral rights are your right to be credited and to object to distortion of your work, and in India they stay with you even after you sell the copyright. Section 57 covers authors and Section 38B covers performers. Germany and the UK have similar rules. The US limits them to a narrow class of visual art, which leaves music out. Here is what that means for AI remixes, deepfakes and uncredited samples.

    Artist rightsvia Indian Kanoon

  • Suno's 20-downloads-a-month cap turns a producer's sketchpad into a ration book

    From 3 September 2026, Suno Pro allows 20 song downloads a month and Premier 60, while free accounts that existed before then get seven lifetime trial downloads with no commercial rights. Listening stays unlimited; leaving the platform is what's metered. For producers who use Suno as one tool inside a DAW, that turns auditioning ideas into rationing, and it pulls the finishing work into Suno's own Studio.

    AIvia Suno Help Center

  • India's radio royalties explained: Section 31D, IPRS and PPL India for independent artists

    Indian radio stations do not need your permission to play a published song. Section 31D of the Copyright Act lets them broadcast it under a statutory licence, as long as they give notice and pay royalties at a rate fixed by law. IPRS collects for the song and PPL India for the recording. Here is what IPRS charges a radio channel, who actually sets the rate, and how to register so the money can reach you.

    Artist rightsvia Indian Kanoon

  • 360 deals vs distribution vs label services: which deal takes what

    A distributor licenses your music for a fee and takes nothing else. A label-services company licenses your masters for a few years and keeps a larger cut. A traditional label usually owns the masters and pays you a royalty, and a 360 deal adds a share of touring, merch and other income on top. Here is what each one takes, in one table, and when each makes sense for an independent artist.

    Industryvia UK Competition and Markets Authority

  • Work for hire in music: when the song you played on isn't yours

    Under US law a "work made for hire" makes the hiring party the legal author, which also switches off the right to take your work back after 35 years. A clause saying "work for hire" doesn't make it true, though. Here is when it actually applies to music, and what to check before you sign.

    Artist rightsvia U.S. Copyright Office

  • Stem separation doesn't make samples free: sample clearance explained

    Pulling a drum break or an acapella out of a finished record with a stem splitter doesn't turn it into a new sound. It is still a copy of someone else's recording and song, so in most cases it needs two licences, one for the master and one for the composition.

    Artist rightsvia US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (via UC Berkeley School of Law)

  • Producers: how to get paid by SoundExchange with a Letter of Direction

    Producers, mixers and engineers only get US digital radio royalties from SoundExchange if the featured artist signs a Letter of Direction, or, for recordings made before November 1995, through a narrow 2% fallback in the statute. Here is how both routes work, with the numbers, and what to put in your producer agreement so you never have to chase it.

    Industryvia Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School

  • ISRC, ISWC, IPI, UPC: the four codes that decide whether you get paid

    Four codes identify your recording, your song, you as a writer and your release. Royalties go missing when they don't line up with each other, usually because the splits disagree or nobody linked the recording to the song. Here is what each code does, who issues it, and a release-day checklist.

    Industryvia International ISRC Agency (IFPI)

  • Arabic music's big summer on Anghami: Hamaki's 71m streams, and what the numbers don't say

    Anghami says summer 2026 was one of its strongest for Arabic music, led by Mohamed Hamaki's album with 71 million streams and 18 of its Top 20 chart slots. Behind the charts is a company whose US$99.3m revenue and 3.5 million paid subscribers include a video service, and whose growth runs through telcos, device bundles and exclusives. Here is what that means for independent Arabic artists.

    Industryvia Anghami Inc. via SEC EDGAR

  • UMG calls DistroKid an "AI-slop pipeline", and human indie artists are getting swept out with the slop

    Universal Music Group sued DistroKid in Delaware on 15 Sep 2026, calling it an "AI-slop pipeline" and citing one account that released 4,562 tracks in a year. DistroKid has since confirmed it removed "a very small number" of recordings in response to UMG's claims, and independent artists say original and licensed work went with them, with no notice and no clear way to appeal.

    Industryvia US District Court for the District of Delaware (via CourtListener)

  • AI music detectors are not proof: what a benchmark of eight of them found

    Intrect tested eight public AI music detectors on the same 2,104 files. The public Deezer research model flagged 13% of real tracks and caught 64.6% of AI ones, and two detectors flagged more than two-thirds of real music as AI. Vendors advertise 99%. Here is how to read the gap, and what to do if a score lands on your release.

    AIvia Intrect Research

  • Recoupment explained: why an artist with a hit can still be "in debt" to the label

    A record advance is paid back out of your royalty share, not your bank account, so at a 20% royalty a $50,000 advance needs about $250,000 of revenue before you see another cent. Here is the arithmetic, what cross-collateralization and recoupable costs do to it, and what to negotiate before you sign.

    Industryvia UK Competition and Markets Authority

  • Releasing a cover song legally: the mechanical licence, what you can't change, and who gets paid

    In the US, anyone can record and release a cover of a song that has already been released, without asking, as long as they get a mechanical licence and pay the writers the legal rate. Here is what that licence covers, what you must leave alone, why streaming and downloads are treated differently, and a pre-release checklist.

    Artist rightsvia Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School

  • Played on a record? The AFM & SAG-AFTRA Fund may owe you money

    US law sets aside 5% of SoundExchange digital radio royalties for backing musicians and singers, and the AFM & SAG-AFTRA Fund pays it out whether or not you are in a union. Here is who qualifies, how the money is split, and how to check the unclaimed list.

    Industryvia AFM & SAG-AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund

  • The EU's "bestseller clause": your right to fair pay, yearly statements and a second negotiation

    Articles 18 to 22 of the EU's 2019 copyright directive give songwriters and performers a right to proportionate pay, a yearly report on what their work earned, a claim for more when a deal turns out lopsided, and a way to take back rights that sit unused. The rules are real, but each country wrote its own version, and most of it only works if you ask.

    Artist rightsvia EUR-Lex, Publications Office of the European Union

  • UMG signs ElevenLabs, and ElevenMusic adds downloads and a rights promise a day later

    Universal Music Group signed its first deal with ElevenLabs on 10 Sep 2026, for a fan remix platform that will include "personalized vocal experiences". A day later ElevenMusic shipped v2.5 with downloads and new terms. Those terms show what voice consent could look like on the UMG product, and where it falls short.

    AIvia ElevenLabs

  • Small claims for songs: how the US Copyright Claims Board works for musicians

    The US Copyright Claims Board lets you pursue an infringement claim of up to $30,000 online, without a lawyer, for a $100 filing fee. It only works if your song is registered (or at least applied for), the other side is in the US, and they choose not to opt out.

    Artist rightsvia Copyright Claims Board

  • Suno's licensed era: what v6 changed for the people who make music with it

    Suno's v6, launched on 9 Sep 2026, is the first model it built with Warner, BMG and Believe, and every older model was retired. The labels have deals; the opt-in products that would pay individual artists don't exist yet. And people who had built a sound on v5.5 lost the instrument they were playing.

    Releasesvia Suno

  • "AI training is fair use" isn't settled law: what Bartz and Kadrey decided, and why music is different

    Two US judges ruled in June 2025 that training language models on books was fair use, but only on the records in front of them, and one said plainly that most such copying will likely be illegal. Music cases turn on market harm, and that is where songwriters and labels have a stronger hand than the authors did.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court, N.D. California (via CourtListener RECAP)

  • Believe and TuneCore went from blocking Suno to distributing it in just over four months

    In April, Believe called Suno a "pirate studio" and said its detector could spot Suno tracks with 99% reliability. On 8 Sep 2026 it signed a global partnership to distribute music from Suno's new licensed model. The output didn't change category because of the technology. It changed because of a contract artists weren't party to.

    Industryvia Suno

  • Spotify's audiobook "bundle" still costs songwriters, and the MLC just lost its shortcut

    A New York federal judge has refused to let the Mechanical Licensing Collective appeal early against the ruling that Spotify Premium is a "bundle" with audiobooks, which lets Spotify pay US songwriters a lower mechanical rate. The judge also threw out Spotify's "unclean hands" defence. Songwriters now wait for the whole case to finish, even though subscription prices rose again in February.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court, Southern District of New York

  • Spotify doesn't pay per stream: streamshare explained with real numbers

    Spotify pays rights holders a share of each country's monthly royalty pool, in proportion to their share of streams there. The "per-stream rate" is a number worked out afterwards, which is why it moves by country and month, and why your deal matters more than the rate.

    Industryvia Spotify

  • How YouTube Shorts actually pays when someone uses your song

    Shorts don't pay per play. YouTube pools Shorts Feed ad money each month, takes out a music share for every Short that uses a licensed track, and the music share reaches artists only through a label or distributor. Here is the maths, with YouTube's own worked example, and what to check in your statements.

    Industryvia YouTube Help

  • Bought streams can cost you real money: Spotify's artificial-streaming fee explained

    Since April 2024 Spotify has charged labels and distributors a fee per track when it finds flagrant artificial streaming, and the big distributors pass it straight to artists, at about €10 per flagged track per month. Here is how the penalty works, how artists who never bought a bot get caught, and how to vet a promoter before you pay one.

    Industryvia Spotify for Artists

  • Canada backs off making Spotify pay for Canadian music, and the money has stopped

    Ottawa has told the Federal Court of Appeal it plans to scrap the rule that large foreign streamers pay 5% of their Canadian revenue into Canadian content funds, and replace it with government money. The 31 August payment date came and went with no new transfers. For music, that means FACTOR, Musicaction and the funds behind early-career artists swap a levy that grew with streaming for a budget line that can be cut.

    Industryvia Department of Justice Canada (via Cartt.ca)

  • The DOJ says AI training is fair use. Music's best arguments were never about training

    The US Justice Department has told the court in the New York Times' case against OpenAI that training AI models on copyrighted text is fair use, and it goes out of its way to reject the "market dilution" theory the music industry leans on. It leaves outputs, data sourcing and identity open, and that is where artists' claims are strongest.

    Artist rightsvia US Department of Justice (copy hosted by MusicTechPolicy)

  • Moises Studio goes browser-native: a collaborative AI workspace with an agent built in

    Moises has turned its stem-separation app into a browser workspace with multitrack recording, MIDI, generated parts, private voice models and an agent, and is plugging the same tools into Fender Studio Pro, UA LUNA and SoundCloud. The training promise is unusually firm; the terms on outputs and storage deserve a closer read.

    Releasesvia Moises Newsroom

  • Indian artists' Spotify royalties grew 29% in 2025, and the growth is regional

    Spotify's India Loud & Clear report says royalties generated by Indian artists rose 29% in 2025, led by Telugu (up more than 120%), with over 40% of that money coming from listeners abroad. At home, only about 14.4 million of India's 178 million audio streamers pay, so how much of the growth reaches regional independents depends on their deals and their publishing paperwork.

    Industryvia Spotify Newsroom

  • Japan's record market: streaming hits 46% while vinyl jumps 42%

    Japan's recorded music market grew to an estimated ¥196.5 billion in the first half of 2026, up 4%, and streaming made up 46% of it. CDs fell 11% to ¥72.0 billion and vinyl rose 42%, but physical formats together still slightly outsold digital. For international indies, Japan remains the one big market where the plastic you press can matter as much as the playlist you land on.

    Industryvia Recording Industry Association of Japan (via PR TIMES)

  • Jason Isbell's class action against Suno is about identity, not copyright

    Jason Isbell, David Lowery, Guy Forsyth and Eduardo Calle have sued Suno under state publicity laws and Illinois' biometric privacy law, not copyright. They say Suno's model knows musicians by name and voice. If the theory holds, it gives artists who don't own their masters a claim of their own, though as drafted it favours the famous.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court for the District of Massachusetts (via Music Business Worldwide)

  • The EU AI Act's training rules are now enforceable. What musicians can actually do with them

    From 2 August 2026 the Commission's AI Office can fine general-purpose AI providers that skip their copyright policy or their public summary of training content. The rules give musicians a reference point and a complaint route, but not a list of their songs or a payment. Here is what you can check, what you can reserve, and where the gaps are.

    Artist rightsvia European Commission

  • Kenya's High Court has barred MCSK from collecting royalties. Who pays musicians now?

    Kenya's High Court has barred the Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) from collecting royalties while it appeals the regulator's refusal to license it, weeks after another society, KAMP, had its licence suspended, and days before the regulator dissolved KAMP's board. Collection now runs through one licensed society, and some of the money is frozen. A draft copyright bill would change how a suspension like this works.

    Artist rightsvia Kenya Copyright Board (copy hosted by EIFL)

  • Your 2027 release checklist: every guide from this run on one page

    We spent a month writing practical guides on releasing music, from registering a song to reading the statement that pays for it. This is the short version, in the order you will need it, with each step pointing back to the guide and the official page behind it.

    Industryvia Spotify for Artists

  • Brazil's music societies told big tech to license now. The AI bill is still waiting

    ECAD, Brazil's central collecting office, and the music societies that run it joined broadcasters and publishers in a letter to OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon and others. It says AI use of their members' work needs authorisation and payment under the 1998 copyright law, and invites talks to avoid litigation. Brazil's AI bill, which would write that into statute, has stalled in the Chamber of Deputies until after the elections.

    AIvia Ecad

  • 'Do not train' opt-outs for musicians: what works, what courts have said, and how to set one up

    EU law lets you reserve your music from commercial AI training, and German courts have now said what a valid reservation looks like. Opt-outs are worth setting up, but treat them as evidence for later rather than a lock. Here is a realistic setup, from robots.txt to your collecting society, and where it stops working.

    Artist rightsvia Publications Office of the European Union

  • AI mastering, honestly: what LANDR and Ozone do well, and where an engineer still wins

    LANDR and Ozone's Master Assistant both learn from finished records and push your mix toward a reference and a loudness target. That makes them fast and cheap at a good mix's last 10%, but a 472-listener public blind test still put two human engineers on top. Here is how the assistants work, how to test them fairly, and what they cost.

    AIvia LANDR

  • Musicians' mental health by the numbers, and where to get help

    The best UK data says three in ten musicians report poor mental wellbeing, and the share roughly doubles between the best-paid and the worst-paid. Music Minds Matter is running a new study in 2026. Here is what the numbers show, what they can't show, and the free helplines open to anyone working in music.

    Industryvia Help Musicians

  • Accessible music tech in 2026: AI sketches, cheap gamepads and the disabled musicians setting the brief

    Two NIME 2026 papers and Berklee's ABLE Assembly show where accessible instrument design is heading. Generative AI helped a disabled co-designer sketch a bespoke instrument but failed at physical fit, while a kit built from a generic gamepad, 3D prints and an old Android phone cost about INR 3,600 in rural India.

    Industryvia NIME 2026 Proceedings (Aynsley, Barker, Warner, Meckin, Mitchell)

  • Registering your song's copyright in India: a step-by-step guide

    In India your song is protected the moment you make it, so registration is optional. What it gives you is evidence a court will accept. One song can be three separate works (the music, the lyrics and the recording), each needing its own application, fee and consent letters from your co-writers.

    Artist rightsvia IP India (Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks)

  • What it costs a foreign band to play America in 2026: the visa bill, line by line

    A four-piece band now pays about $5,400 in US government fees before it plays a note, and most of that is premium processing that waits of nearly a year make hard to avoid. We add up the O and P visa bill from USCIS and State Department sources, and look at who it shuts out.

    Industryvia US Citizenship and Immigration Services

  • Pitching Spotify's playlist editors: what to write in the 500 characters

    Spotify lets you pitch one unreleased song at a time to its editors, and a pitch made 7 days out puts that song in your followers' Release Radar. Here are the rules as Spotify states them, the fields that matter, a template and three invented example pitches.

    Industryvia Spotify for Artists

  • Grimes' 50/50 voice offer, three years on: 168 GrimesAI releases. Did open licensing work?

    In 2023 Grimes let anyone release songs with an AI copy of her voice in exchange for half the master royalties. About three years on, the GrimesAI profile lists 168 releases, the Elf.Tech site has gone quiet and Grimes now says humans still have to tell the story. Here is what worked, what didn't, and what other artists can borrow.

    AIvia TuneCore Help Center

  • Spotify's "AI Persona" badge labels faces, not songs, and it decides who gets recommended

    Spotify will badge artist profiles whose public identity looks like a photorealistic AI-generated person, and keep those profiles out of editorial and algorithmic recommendations by default. The badge says nothing about how the music was made. For artists, that means the face on the profile now matters more to discovery than the method behind the track.

    Industryvia Spotify Newsroom

  • France may flip the burden of proof on AI training: SACEM, its opt-out and the Darcos Bill

    France's Senate has passed a one-article bill that would presume an AI provider used a protected work whenever there is a plausible sign that it did, leaving the provider to prove otherwise. SACEM, which has opted its repertoire out of AI mining since October 2023, wants it passed. It has been stuck in the National Assembly since June, and the reason it matters is that an opt-out is hard to enforce if you can't prove your music was used.

    Artist rightsvia Sénat

  • Loudness normalisation explained: why mastering to -8 LUFS gets turned down on Spotify

    Spotify plays music at -14 LUFS by default and turns louder masters down, so a -8 LUFS master buys you no extra volume, only less dynamic range and more risk of encoding distortion. Here is what Spotify, Apple and YouTube actually document, what they leave out, and how to make mastering decisions with that in mind.

    Industryvia Spotify for Artists

  • India's oldest label is using AI to make the music videos it never owned

    Saregama owns the songs and recordings for much of Hindi cinema's 1960s and 1970s music, but not the film clips that went with them. It now uses generative AI to make new videos for those songs, and to rework some for younger listeners, while it still argues against unlicensed AI. The label hasn't said whether the original singers' or composers' estates get any say.

    AIvia Music Business Worldwide

  • SoundExchange, explained: the US digital radio royalty you only get if you register

    SoundExchange collects US royalties when recordings play on non-interactive digital services such as SiriusXM, Pandora and iHeartRadio. Registration is free and open to artists outside the US, but unclaimed money expires after three years, and self-releasing artists who register only as performers leave the larger share behind.

    Industryvia Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School

  • Treblo's own detector flagged a Hot 100 hit as its output. That is the real power shift

    AI music app Treblo released a detector built to recognise its own output, and it returned "very likely Treblo" for Fenix Flexin's "Rubberz", a song then at No. 58 on the Billboard Hot 100. Fenix had denied using AI and later admitted it. The bigger story is that a generator that can identify its own output holds leverage over every artist who used it.

    AIvia Spotify Newsroom

  • Buying the venues: Music Venue Properties secures its tenth grassroots room, Brighton's Pipeline

    Music Venue Properties, the charitable community benefit society set up by Music Venue Trust, has bought The Pipeline in Brighton, the tenth grassroots venue secured through its Own Our Venues campaign. The model swaps a commercial landlord for a charitable one. That removes the property risk behind more than a third of venue closures, but it does nothing for the thin margins behind most of the rest.

    Industryvia Music Venue Trust

  • Your unclaimed mechanicals have a deadline: the MLC starts market-share payouts in 2027

    The Mechanical Licensing Collective plans to start paying out unmatched and unclaimed US streaming mechanicals by market share in 2027, beginning with January 2021 usage. Money that nobody has claimed by then goes to whoever already earns the most. Here is how to register, match and claim before it does.

    Industryvia The Mechanical Licensing Collective

  • Munich court: a model that memorises songs is copying them

    A Munich court has largely ruled for GEMA against Suno over six songs, finding they were memorised inside Suno's v3.5 and v4 models and that this is copying. It also applied US fair use to Suno's US training and rejected it. The ruling isn't final, and its limits matter as much as the headline.

    Artist rightsvia Landgericht München I

  • UK grassroots venues by the numbers: 30 closed, 801 still open, and what the £1 arena levy has paid so far

    Music Venue Trust's 2025 annual report counts 801 UK grassroots venues trading, down from 810, the smallest fall since 2018, but more than half made no profit and jobs fell by almost a fifth. The voluntary £1 levy on shows over 5,000 capacity covered 8.8% of arena and stadium tickets in 2025, and its first payouts (£500,000 on 28 January 2026, £1m more in July) are small against a £76.6m live-music loss.

    Industryvia Music Venue Trust

  • Murphy Campbell's AI clones show what a right to your voice can and can't fix

    AI covers built from North Carolina folk singer Murphy Campbell's YouTube performances appeared on streaming services under her name, then her own videos of public-domain songs were hit with copyright claims. The Musicians' Union now uses her case to argue for UK personality rights. Her story suggests a right on paper is only the first of three things artists need.

    Artist rightsvia Musicians' Union

  • BTS lifted South Korea to No. 3 music exporter, but Korean-language listening in the US didn't move

    Luminate's 2026 midyear report puts South Korea third in its Export Power Rankings, up from fourth in 2025, and credits BTS's ARIRANG. The same report shows Korean-language songs holding steady at 1.1% of US streams, and ARIRANG's US success running on CD sales more than streams. One comeback can move a country's ranking without changing what most listeners choose to play, and that matters for every act not singing in English.

    Industryvia Luminate

  • Sony buys the old Hipgnosis catalogue: what changes for the songwriters inside it

    Sony Music Publishing has closed its purchase of Recognition Music Group's 45,000-song catalogue, the former Hipgnosis portfolio, at a price reported at $3.5 billion to $4 billion. For the writers whose shares are inside it, the songs are now with their third owner, and each sale has taken them further from the people who wrote them.

    Industryvia GIC (joint press release with Sony Music Publishing and Blackstone)

  • Primary Wave closes its Kobalt deal. What Kobalt's writers should check now

    Primary Wave has completed its purchase of Kobalt, reportedly for around $1.5 billion. The publisher known for transparent admin now belongs to a company whose main business is buying song catalogues, and that changes the questions Kobalt's clients should be asking.

    Industryvia Francisco Partners

  • inMusic now owns Native Instruments. What happens to your Kontakt and Komplete licences?

    The sale of insolvent Native Instruments took effect on 1 July 2026: inMusic took the core business and Boris FX took iZotope. NI says existing licences are unaffected, but its products need online activation and its new owner has already cut staff, so producers should plan for the licence server, not the press release.

    Industryvia Chambers and Partners (GÖRG press release)

  • China's AI labelling rules meet the music apps, and NetEase says its labels are still a test

    China has required AI-generated audio to carry a label and embedded metadata since 1 Sep 2025, and platforms must detect AI content and let uploaders declare it. In April 2026 NetEase Cloud Music told a Chinese newspaper its AI labels were still in a small-scale test and relied mostly on creators declaring AI themselves. We think that leaves honest creators carrying the cost.

    AIvia Cyberspace Administration of China

  • Japan's JASRAC won't collect for fully AI-made songs, and wants the training exception in Article 30-4 changed

    Japan's biggest music rights society will only manage the human-made parts of a song, and songwriters must say which parts AI made when they register. It is also asking for Article 30-4, which lets AI firms train on works without permission, to give creators a choice. That puts Japan's songwriters further from a say over training than their counterparts in the EU or the UK.

    Artist rightsvia Japan Copyright Office (Agency for Cultural Affairs)

  • Xania Monet, a year on: her manager has an AI label deal, and a lawsuit now targets the name

    A trademark suit filed in Connecticut on 10 June names Hallwood Media, Xania Monet creator Telisha Jones and a company called TJM Inc. It comes months after Monet's manager launched an AI-and-human label venture with Create Music Group. Both raise the same question about an AI act. If copyright barely reaches the voice, the name is the main thing anyone can own.

    AIvia PacerMonitor (US District Court, District of Connecticut docket)

  • Studio One is now Fender Studio Pro 8, and Moises's AI stem tools are built in

    PreSonus's Studio One became Fender Studio Pro 8 in January, and the 8.1 update in June built Moises's stem separation, stem generation and voice conversion into the DAW. The catch for anyone who prefers to own their tools is that a DAW you can buy outright now comes with a monthly AI allowance.

    Releasesvia Moises Newsroom

  • Anime is Japan's music export engine: what 'IRIS OUT' and Ado teach artists about sync

    Kenshi Yonezu's anime film theme "IRIS OUT" topped Billboard JAPAN's first-half 2026 chart after reaching No. 5 on the Billboard Global 200, the highest yet for a Japanese-language song. Japan's trade ministry puts the music industry's 2024 overseas income at ¥72.58bn, and most of the money it can trace arrives as streams, not sync fees. The lesson for artists anywhere is that a placement is where discovery starts, and the money comes later.

    Industryvia Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)

  • TIDAL lets US independent artists sell music directly and keep 90%. Is it a Bandcamp alternative?

    TIDAL now lets independent artists in the US sell tracks and albums through TIDAL Upload, with payments run by Square and 90% of each sale going to the artist before processing fees and taxes. Uploads earn no streaming royalties, so for a DIY artist on TIDAL a sale is the main way to get paid. On fees alone it undercuts Bandcamp for newer sellers, but it is US-only, digital-only and has no fan community yet.

    Industryvia Block

  • Sweden's STIM makes AI licensing opt-in, one work at a time

    STIM's members have voted to create a separate AI rights category, in force from 1 Jun 2026. No work goes into an AI licence unless its creator switches it on, work by work; everything else stays monitored but excluded. It is the most consent-heavy model we have seen a collecting society adopt, and its weak spot is scale, not principle.

    AIvia STIM

  • Udio's Starstruck: a licensed walled garden where fans make music as your favourite artist

    Udio's licensed app Starstruck will let fans cover, reimagine, remix or write new songs, but only as a named, opted-in artist, with royalties paid on every creation and nothing allowed to leave the app. It is AI as fan merchandise rather than an artist's tool, and the opt-in usually runs through the label or publisher, not the artist.

    AIvia Universal Music Group

  • UMG and TikTok renew their deal and promise to remove "unauthorised" AI music, without saying what that means

    Universal Music Group and TikTok signed a new multi-year licence on 22 May 2026 that keeps UMG's catalogue on the app and repeats a pledge to remove "unauthorized AI-generated music". Neither company has said what "unauthorised" means, how tracks are detected or how an artist can appeal, and that gap falls hardest on independent artists who use AI tools legitimately.

    Industryvia TikTok Newsroom

  • Tencent Music lets AI songs onto QQ Music, but puts fully AI tracks on a different royalty model

    Tencent Music says more than 10 million people use its AI music production platform, and its tools can publish a generated song to QQ Music in one click. On its Q4 call it said songs made wholly by AI get a different royalty-sharing model, while AI-assisted songs sung by humans stay on the traditional one. We haven't seen a big Western streaming service draw that line in public.

    AIvia Tencent Music Entertainment Group

  • Coca-Cola denies its ad copied Johnny Cash's voice in an ELVIS Act case with no AI in it

    Coca-Cola has answered the Johnny Cash estate's lawsuit over a college-football ad sung by a Cash tribute performer, admitting the ad uses "a male singing voice" but denying it infringes. The most prominent case yet under Tennessee's AI-era voice law, as far as we know, turns on a human soundalike, which is exactly why session singers and tribute acts should follow it.

    Artist rightsvia CourtListener

  • "Blue dot fever": why big US tours are being cut, and who pays when they are

    Pussycat Dolls, Meghan Trainor, Zayn and Post Malone with Jelly Roll all cut US dates this spring as unsold seats showed up as blue dots on Ticketmaster maps. Live Nation says demand is at record levels, so the real story is which tours were sized and priced past their audience, and who absorbs the loss when they fold.

    Industryvia Live Nation Entertainment

  • Ableton Live 12.4 streams audio between devices and lets you split stems from a selection

    Live 12.4, a free update for Live 12 owners, adds Link Audio for streaming sound between Live, Push, Move and Note over a local network, and lets Suite users separate stems from part of a clip. The networking is useful but fragile on Wi-Fi; the stem tools make pulling an acapella trivial, which is a clearance problem as much as a creative one.

    Releasesvia Ableton Help Center

  • Pro Tools 2026.4: AI speech-to-text, Track Pin and MPEG-H immersive mixing

    Pro Tools 2026.4 makes its on-device transcription survive bounces and edits, adds MPEG-H broadcast mixing with Fraunhofer, and gives every tier a Track Pin. Most of the new work sits in the Studio and Ultimate tiers and points at post-production and broadcast, which tells you where Avid sees its paying customers.

    Releasesvia Avid Knowledge Base

  • Indonesia rewrites how music royalties are split, and says live streams can owe them too

    Indonesia's national royalty body, LMKN, has issued 2026 distribution rules that pay first on reported usage data and give a capped fallback allocation to members whose songs never show up in the logs. The same body says music in TikTok and YouTube live streams can owe royalties. For songwriters, getting your songs into the data now decides more of what you're paid.

    Industryvia LMKN

  • Splice's new AI tools pay sample creators per use. Now it should publish the rate

    Splice launched Variations and Craft, with Magic Fit to follow, and says the original sample creator is paid each time their sound is used as a source and each time a variation is downloaded. It is one of the clearer consent-and-pay designs in music AI, but Splice hasn't said what a use is worth, and producers carry the release risk.

    AIvia Splice

  • All-in ticket prices are now US law: StubHub pays $10M, and the TICKET Act still waits on the Senate

    StubHub has agreed to pay $10 million to settle FTC charges that it hid mandatory fees in the three days after the FTC's fee rule took effect on 12 May 2025. That rule already makes all-in pricing the law for US live-event tickets. The TICKET Act, which would add a ban on speculative tickets and refund rights, passed the House 409-15 almost a year ago and still has no Senate vote. For artists, the rule changes what fans see, not what they pay or who gets the money.

    Industryvia Federal Trade Commission

  • Deezer turned a profit. Here is how its artist-centric model moves the money, and who it moves it from

    Deezer reported €8.5 million of net income for 2025, which it calls its first positive net income, and credits its artist-centric payment model among its strengths. The model weights streams by who the artist is and how the fan found the track. We explain the rules, who gains and who loses, and why the profit says little about whether artists are better off.

    Industryvia Deezer Newsroom

  • The UK drops its AI copyright opt-out plan, and the same idea turns up in Australia

    On 18 March 2026 the UK government said a copyright exception letting AI firms train on work unless creators opt out is no longer its preferred option. Musicians won this one through public pressure and votes in Parliament, but the government hasn't ruled the idea out, and seven months later an opt-out model is on the table in Australia.

    Artist rightsvia GOV.UK (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

  • Spotify's ₦60bn for Nigerian artists, and the per-stream gap behind it

    Spotify says Nigerian artists generated more than ₦60bn on its service in 2025 from 30.3 billion streams. The total is real, but roughly ₦2 a stream and a Premium price near $1 a month suggest much of that money comes from listeners abroad. Spotify's plan is to sign up more payers, not raise prices.

    Industryvia TechCabal

  • Bitwig Studio 6: automation done right, plus clip aliases and project-wide scales

    Bitwig Studio 6, out on 11 Mar 2026, is a workflow release with no AI headline. It rebuilds automation around an overlay mode and clips that move with their music, adds linked clip aliases and gives every project a key and scale. It comes free to customers with an active Upgrade Plan, on a perpetual licence rather than a subscription.

    Releasesvia Bitwig

  • TikTok's Play Full Song turns some TikTok listens into paid Apple Music streams

    TikTok and Apple Music launched Play Full Song on 11 Mar 2026, letting Apple Music subscribers hear a whole track inside TikTok through Apple's MusicKit, so the play is paid as an Apple Music stream. The 15-second clip in the feed still isn't a stream, the feature is exclusive to Apple, and Spotify listeners still only get a save button.

    Industryvia TikTok Newsroom

  • LALAL.AI's local stem splitter shows where your audio should stay: on your machine

    LALAL.AI's first plugin, launched in February 2026 and since expanded to seven stems on its local Lyra model, splits audio without uploading it. LALAL.AI admits Lyra gives up some quality against its cloud models, but for unreleased music, where the audio goes is a question worth asking of every AI tool.

    Releasesvia LALAL.AI

  • Cubase 15 puts AI stem separation behind the Pro paywall

    Steinberg's Cubase 15 adds a melodic pattern sequencer, six new modulators, Yamaha-powered Omnivocal and built-in AI stem separation. The stem tool is Pro-only, so getting it means the $579.99 edition, $250 more than Artist.

    Releasesvia Steinberg

  • Voice actors win round one against an AI voice company in New York: what Lehrman v. Lovo means for singers

    A federal judge in Manhattan has let two voice actors pursue New York publicity, consumer-protection and contract claims against Lovo, the AI voice company they say cloned them, while dismissing most of their trademark and copyright claims. This was a ruling on a motion to dismiss, not a win at trial. Its reasoning still matters to singers: in this court's view, copyright in a recording doesn't protect the voice on it, but New York's civil rights law does.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court for the Southern District of New York

  • Ed Sheeran's 'Thinking Out Loud' sheet-music case is over: chord progressions and rhythms are building blocks

    On 16 June 2025 the US Supreme Court declined to hear Structured Asset Sales' appeal, leaving the 2nd Circuit's ruling in place: a common four-chord progression plus a syncopated harmonic rhythm is too unoriginal to protect, and for a 1909 Act song only the deposited sheet music counts. That standard matters for every 'it sounds like my song' claim, including the ones now aimed at AI outputs.

    Artist rightsvia Supreme Court of the United States

  • Randy Travis got his voice back with AI. The harder question is who else had to say yes

    A model trained on Randy Travis's own vocal stems turned another singer's demo into "Where That Came From", his first new song in over a decade. Eleven months later Travis backed the NO FAKES Act against voice theft. The line between the two is consent and control, and the Travis case shows it has to cover the human singer underneath as well as the star on the label.

    AIvia U.S. Government Publishing Office

  • Mariah Carey won sanctions against a Christmas-song plaintiff, and Dua Lipa beat 'Levitating': 2025's failed plagiarism suits

    In March 2025 two federal judges threw out song-theft suits against Mariah Carey's 'All I Want for Christmas Is You' and Dua Lipa's 'Levitating', both because the shared material wasn't protectable. Carey's judge went further and sanctioned the plaintiffs' side; in December the bill came to about $92,300 for Carey alone. For songwriters thinking of suing, the lesson is to filter out the building blocks before anyone files.

    Artist rightsvia US District Court for the Central District of California (via Digital Music News)

  • Two answers to AI voices: Céline Dion disowns the fakes, while Sevdaliza licenses hers for a 50% split

    Céline Dion's team has warned fans that "unsanctioned" AI recordings using her voice and name are circulating on streaming services. In 2023 Sevdaliza went the other way, opening an AI model of her voice, Dahlia, to anyone on the Myvox platform for half the royalties. Both are legitimate choices, and each depends on consent being written down somewhere a platform can act on it.

    AIvia Dazed

  • The silent album: how 1,000 UK artists turned an empty studio into a campaign

    Is This What We Want?, out on 25 February 2025, is 12 recordings of empty studios and performance spaces, credited to more than 1,000 musicians, whose track titles spell out a message to the UK government. It landed on the day the government's AI copyright consultation closed. As a piece of artist activism it is unusually well designed, and the design is worth copying.

    Industryvia Is This What We Want? (artists' campaign)

  • The Beatles' "Now and Then" won a Grammy with AI, but the AI didn't make Lennon's voice

    "Now and Then" won Best Rock Performance at the 2025 Grammys. The machine learning behind it separated John Lennon's real vocal from a late-1970s home demo; it did not generate a voice. That distinction is what kept the record inside the Recording Academy's human-authorship rules, and it is the line the industry should be arguing about instead of "AI or not".

    AIvia Recording Academy (GRAMMY.com)

  • FKA twigs built a digital twin of herself, then told the Senate artists must control it

    At a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the draft NO FAKES Act on 30 April 2024, FKA twigs said she had spent a year building an AI version of herself that speaks in her voice, and argued the line between a useful tool and a theft is whether the artist controls it. Her label's CEO, sitting beside her, argued the new right should be transferable. That tension is the real story.

    Artist rightsvia Tech Policy Press

  • Tupac's estate v. Drake: the AI diss track that tested publicity rights for the dead

    Tupac Shakur's estate sent Drake a cease-and-desist over the AI-voiced "Taylor Made Freestyle" and he pulled the track from Instagram and X within days. He folded without a court testing the estate's claim, and under California law as it stood then, a song was exactly the kind of work the dead's publicity right exempted. California's AB 1836 has since closed much of that gap.

    Artist rightsvia California Senate Judiciary Committee

  • Bad Bunny vs. "NostalgIA": when the artist says no to an AI hit

    A Chilean producer recorded a track with AI voices made to sound like Bad Bunny, Justin Bieber and Daddy Yankee, and it went viral on TikTok. Bad Bunny told fans who liked it to leave his WhatsApp channel, and the creator says Apple Music and Spotify then pulled versions of it. Nobody has said which rule was applied, which is the real story: without a law covering voice, takedown decisions are left to platforms.

    AIvia Página 7

  • 'Dark Horse': how a $2.8M verdict against Katy Perry was wiped out over an unoriginal ostinato

    The Ninth Circuit has upheld the decision to throw out a jury's $2.8 million copyright verdict against Katy Perry, holding that the eight-note figure 'Dark Horse' shares with Flame's 'Joyful Noise' is built entirely from commonplace musical elements. The opinion is the clearest plain-English account yet of how courts separate a song's building blocks from what a songwriter can own.

    Artist rightsvia U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Subscribe to We are the music makers

One email a week: the music-tech and AI-in-music news that mattered, and what we think about it.

Sign-ups open soon.