Topic

Music production culture

  • How working producers actually use AI (it's not what the headlines say)

    How producers actually use AI is mostly unglamorous: splitting stems, mastering, EQ and cleanup, with full AI-generated songs a small minority. Tracklib's producer surveys put AI use at 25% in 2024 and 32% in 2025, LANDR found 87% of its community uses AI somewhere, and both agree the main job is assisting, not replacing. What the surveys say, why they disagree, and what it means for a beginner.

    Workflows

  • Is using AI to make music cheating?

    Is using AI to make music cheating? Not when a human makes the creative decisions, and that is the line the music world itself has drawn. The Grammys accept work with AI material if the human part is meaningful, producers broadly accept assistive AI while rejecting one-prompt songs, and the history of Auto-Tune and the Beatles' "Now and Then" shows today's shortcut becoming tomorrow's instrument.

    Workflows

  • Will AI make producers lazy? The craft argument, examined

    Will AI make producers lazy? The strongest case says yes: an MIT Media Lab study found people who wrote with an AI assistant showed the weakest brain connectivity and struggled to quote their own work. But producers mostly use AI for chores such as stem separation and mastering, not to write songs, and the same study found that thinking first and using AI second worked better. Used that way, AI frees time for the craft rather than replacing it.

    Workflows

Subscribe to We are the music makers

One email a week: the music-tech and AI-in-music news that mattered, and what we think about it.

Sign-ups open soon.