
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/right-of-publicity/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/jason-isbell-suno-class-action-publicity-rights</guid>
    <title>Jason Isbell&#39;s class action against Suno is about identity, not copyright</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/jason-isbell-suno-class-action-publicity-rights</link>
    <description>Jason Isbell, David Lowery, Guy Forsyth and Eduardo Calle have sued Suno under state publicity laws and Illinois&#39; biometric privacy law, not copyright. They say Suno&#39;s model knows musicians by name and voice. If the theory holds, it gives artists who don&#39;t own their masters a claim of their own, though as drafted it favours the famous.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>suno</category><category>right-of-publicity</category><category>ai-music</category><category>lawsuits</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2025/07/lehrman-v-lovo-ai-voice-clones-new-york-publicity-law</guid>
    <title>Voice actors win round one against an AI voice company in New York: what Lehrman v. Lovo means for singers</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2025/07/lehrman-v-lovo-ai-voice-clones-new-york-publicity-law</link>
    <description>A federal judge in Manhattan has let two voice actors pursue New York publicity, consumer-protection and contract claims against Lovo, the AI voice company they say cloned them, while dismissing most of their trademark and copyright claims. This was a ruling on a motion to dismiss, not a win at trial. Its reasoning still matters to singers: in this court&#39;s view, copyright in a recording doesn&#39;t protect the voice on it, but New York&#39;s civil rights law does.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>ai</category><category>voice-cloning</category><category>right-of-publicity</category><category>lawsuits</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
