
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/qobuz/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/how-much-music-is-ai-qobuz-siqa-numbers</guid>
    <title>How much music is actually AI? Qobuz and SIQA&#39;s numbers, read carefully</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/how-much-music-is-ai-qobuz-siqa-numbers</link>
    <description>Qobuz says only 0.38% of its streams come from AI-identified tracks, and it treats 60% of those streams as fraud. A self-selected sample of AI creators charted by SIQA points the other way, towards hybrid human-plus-AI work. Supply is huge, real listening is small, and policy written for &quot;fully AI slop&quot; misses most of the people actually using these tools.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai</category><category>ai-music</category><category>qobuz</category><category>streaming-fraud</category><category>data</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
