
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/publicity-rights/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2024/04/tupac-estate-drake-taylor-made-ai-voice-publicity-rights</guid>
    <title>Tupac&#39;s estate v. Drake: the AI diss track that tested publicity rights for the dead</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2024/04/tupac-estate-drake-taylor-made-ai-voice-publicity-rights</link>
    <description>Tupac Shakur&#39;s estate sent Drake a cease-and-desist over the AI-voiced &quot;Taylor Made Freestyle&quot; and he pulled the track from Instagram and X within days. He folded without a court testing the estate&#39;s claim, and under California law as it stood then, a song was exactly the kind of work the dead&#39;s publicity right exempted. California&#39;s AB 1836 has since closed much of that gap.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>voice-rights</category><category>ai</category><category>publicity-rights</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
