
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/grammys/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/2027-grammys-ai-rule-plain-english</guid>
    <title>The 2027 Grammys&#39; AI rule in plain English: only humans win, and the CEO&#39;s bar is higher than the rulebook&#39;s</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/2027-grammys-ai-rule-plain-english</link>
    <description>Grammy nominations land on 16 November. The rulebook lets AI material in, as long as the human part is &quot;meaningful and more than de minimis&quot; and fits the category. Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr says a majority of a song must be human-written, which is a higher bar than the rulebook sets.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>grammys</category><category>awards</category><category>songwriting</category><category>human-authorship</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2025/02/beatles-now-and-then-grammy-separation-not-generation</guid>
    <title>The Beatles&#39; &quot;Now and Then&quot; won a Grammy with AI, but the AI didn&#39;t make Lennon&#39;s voice</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2025/02/beatles-now-and-then-grammy-separation-not-generation</link>
    <description>&quot;Now and Then&quot; won Best Rock Performance at the 2025 Grammys. The machine learning behind it separated John Lennon&#39;s real vocal from a late-1970s home demo; it did not generate a voice. That distinction is what kept the record inside the Recording Academy&#39;s human-authorship rules, and it is the line the industry should be arguing about instead of &quot;AI or not&quot;.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai</category><category>stem-separation</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>grammys</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
