
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/france/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/france-darcos-bill-sacem-ai-training-burden-of-proof</guid>
    <title>France may flip the burden of proof on AI training: SACEM, its opt-out and the Darcos Bill</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/france-darcos-bill-sacem-ai-training-burden-of-proof</link>
    <description>France&#39;s Senate has passed a one-article bill that would presume an AI provider used a protected work whenever there is a plausible sign that it did, leaving the provider to prove otherwise. SACEM, which has opted its repertoire out of AI mining since October 2023, wants it passed. It has been stuck in the National Assembly since June, and the reason it matters is that an opt-out is hard to enforce if you can&#39;t prove your music was used.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>copyright</category><category>legal</category><category>france</category><category>sacem</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
