
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/fair-use/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/suno-mlc-distrokid-subpoenas-data-war</guid>
    <title>The AI music war becomes a data war: Suno subpoenas the MLC, the labels subpoena DistroKid</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/suno-mlc-distrokid-subpoenas-data-war</link>
    <description>In the same week, Suno asked a Nashville court to force the MLC to hand over years of streaming data, and UMG and Sony asked a Manhattan court to force DistroKid to hand over its AI-detection numbers. Both sides want the data that will decide whether AI music has harmed the market. The artists whose plays and uploads fill those tables can&#39;t see any of it.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>industry</category><category>suno</category><category>distrokid</category><category>mlc</category><category>fair-use</category><category>ai-music</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/copyright-office-ai-training-report-still-pre-publication</guid>
    <title>The Copyright Office&#39;s AI training report is still a draft 17 months on, and its critics are using that</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/copyright-office-ai-training-report-still-pre-publication</link>
    <description>The US Copyright Office&#39;s report on generative AI training, released as a &quot;pre-publication version&quot; on 9 May 2025, has never been finalised. Its view that some training is fair use and some isn&#39;t, and that market dilution is real harm, is the closest thing music has to an official US position. Litigants cite it, the Justice Department attacks it, and the two big 2025 rulings didn&#39;t cite it at all.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai</category><category>legal</category><category>copyright</category><category>fair-use</category><category>training-data</category><category>artist-rights</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/ai-training-fair-use-bartz-kadrey-music</guid>
    <title>&quot;AI training is fair use&quot; isn&#39;t settled law: what Bartz and Kadrey decided, and why music is different</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/ai-training-fair-use-bartz-kadrey-music</link>
    <description>Two US judges ruled in June 2025 that training language models on books was fair use, but only on the records in front of them, and one said plainly that most such copying will likely be illegal. Music cases turn on market harm, and that is where songwriters and labels have a stronger hand than the authors did.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai</category><category>fair-use</category><category>copyright</category><category>ai-music</category><category>lawsuits</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/doj-fair-use-nyt-music-lawyers</guid>
    <title>The DOJ says AI training is fair use. Music&#39;s best arguments were never about training</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/doj-fair-use-nyt-music-lawyers</link>
    <description>The US Justice Department has told the court in the New York Times&#39; case against OpenAI that training AI models on copyrighted text is fair use, and it goes out of its way to reject the &quot;market dilution&quot; theory the music industry leans on. It leaves outputs, data sourcing and identity open, and that is where artists&#39; claims are strongest.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>legal</category><category>copyright</category><category>fair-use</category><category>ai-music</category><category>training-data</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
