
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/europe/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/warner-halley-records-artists-keep-masters</guid>
    <title>Warner buys Halley Records, the label behind Oques Grasses. Who owns the masters is still unclear</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/warner-halley-records-artists-keep-masters</link>
    <description>Warner Music Spain has bought all of Halley Records, the Barcelona label behind Oques Grasses and Els Catarres. One outlet says Halley&#39;s licensing model leaves the masters with the artists, but no one else has confirmed it, and that question decides what Warner has actually bought.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>industry</category><category>labels</category><category>acquisitions</category><category>masters</category><category>warner-music</category><category>europe</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/melodifestivalen-2027-4077-entries-no-ai-ban</guid>
    <title>Melodifestivalen got a record 4,077 songs and won&#39;t ban AI. Sweden draws the line at the stage</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/melodifestivalen-2027-4077-entries-no-ai-ban</link>
    <description>SVT received a record 4,077 entries for Melodifestivalen 2027, suspects a growing share were made with AI, has no way to detect them and won&#39;t ban them. Its rules only demand that the lead artist sings live. Greece&#39;s broadcaster went the other way, with a written AI ban and a sworn declaration from every writer.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>industry</category><category>ai-music</category><category>europe</category><category>songwriting</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/denmark-deepfake-bill-l49-consent-burden-of-proof</guid>
    <title>Denmark&#39;s deepfake bill would make whoever posts a voice clone prove they had consent</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/denmark-deepfake-bill-l49-consent-burden-of-proof</link>
    <description>Denmark&#39;s culture minister tabled bill L 49 on 8 Oct 2026. It would bar sharing realistic digital imitations of a person&#39;s voice, face or other features, or of a performer&#39;s performance, without consent, from 1 Jan 2027. It is not law yet. The detail that matters most for singers is in the explanatory notes: the person who publishes the imitation has to prove consent.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>voice-cloning</category><category>copyright</category><category>europe</category><category>policy</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/spain-official-charts-ai-eligibility-rules-promusicae-agedi</guid>
    <title>Spain&#39;s official charts set AI rules: substantially human, lawful and disclosed</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/spain-official-charts-ai-eligibility-rules-promusicae-agedi</link>
    <description>Promusicae and AGEDI, which compile Spain&#39;s official charts, have adopted IFPI&#39;s principles for recordings made with generative AI. A track can chart only if it is substantially human made, made with an authorised AI service and labelled for listeners. None of those terms is defined, and the Spanish announcement mentions no way to appeal.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>industry</category><category>charts</category><category>europe</category><category>promusicae</category><category>agedi</category><category>ifpi</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/france-darcos-bill-sacem-ai-training-burden-of-proof</guid>
    <title>France may flip the burden of proof on AI training: SACEM, its opt-out and the Darcos Bill</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/france-darcos-bill-sacem-ai-training-burden-of-proof</link>
    <description>France&#39;s Senate has passed a one-article bill that would presume an AI provider used a protected work whenever there is a plausible sign that it did, leaving the provider to prove otherwise. SACEM, which has opted its repertoire out of AI mining since October 2023, wants it passed. It has been stuck in the National Assembly since June, and the reason it matters is that an opt-out is hard to enforce if you can&#39;t prove your music was used.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>copyright</category><category>legal</category><category>europe</category><category>sacem</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/stim-ai-rights-category-opt-in-work-by-work</guid>
    <title>Sweden&#39;s STIM makes AI licensing opt-in, one work at a time</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/stim-ai-rights-category-opt-in-work-by-work</link>
    <description>STIM&#39;s members have voted to create a separate AI rights category, in force from 1 Jun 2026. No work goes into an AI licence unless its creator switches it on, work by work; everything else stays monitored but excluded. It is the most consent-heavy model we have seen a collecting society adopt, and its weak spot is scale, not principle.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>licensing</category><category>collecting-societies</category><category>stim</category><category>europe</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
