
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/elvis-act/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/johnny-cash-estate-v-coca-cola-elvis-act</guid>
    <title>Coca-Cola denies its ad copied Johnny Cash&#39;s voice in an ELVIS Act case with no AI in it</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/johnny-cash-estate-v-coca-cola-elvis-act</link>
    <description>Coca-Cola has answered the Johnny Cash estate&#39;s lawsuit over a college-football ad sung by a Cash tribute performer, admitting the ad uses &quot;a male singing voice&quot; but denying it infringes. The most prominent case yet under Tennessee&#39;s AI-era voice law, as far as we know, turns on a human soundalike, which is exactly why session singers and tribute acts should follow it.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>elvis-act</category><category>voice-rights</category><category>soundalikes</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
