
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/dolby-atmos/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/apple-music-dolby-atmos-spatial-bonus-worth-it</guid>
    <title>Apple Music pays up to 10% more for Dolby Atmos. Is the mix worth it for an independent release?</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/apple-music-dolby-atmos-spatial-bonus-worth-it</link>
    <description>Apple Music weights plays of tracks available in Spatial Audio at 1.1 against 1 for everything else, whether or not anyone listens in spatial. The catch is that you can&#39;t fake the mix, and the maths only works for tracks with a lot of Apple plays.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>workflows</category><category>apple-music</category><category>dolby-atmos</category><category>spatial-audio</category><category>royalties</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
