
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/deepfakes/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/italy-ai-law-human-authorship-producers</guid>
    <title>Italy wrote &quot;human authorship&quot; into law: what its AI act means for producers using AI</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/italy-ai-law-human-authorship-producers</link>
    <description>Italy&#39;s AI law, Law No. 132 of 2025, amended the country&#39;s copyright act so that only works of human intellect are protected, including AI-assisted works that are &quot;the result of the author&#39;s intellectual work&quot;. It also made spreading harmful AI-faked voices a crime. The law doesn&#39;t say how much human input is enough, so the evidence a producer keeps becomes the practical safeguard.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>copyright</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>human-authorship</category><category>italy</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/denmark-deepfake-bill-l49-consent-burden-of-proof</guid>
    <title>Denmark&#39;s deepfake bill would make whoever posts a voice clone prove they had consent</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/denmark-deepfake-bill-l49-consent-burden-of-proof</link>
    <description>Denmark&#39;s culture minister tabled bill L 49 on 8 Oct 2026. It would bar sharing realistic digital imitations of a person&#39;s voice, face or other features, or of a performer&#39;s performance, without consent, from 1 Jan 2027. It is not law yet. The detail that matters most for singers is in the explanatory notes: the person who publishes the imitation has to prove consent.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>voice-cloning</category><category>copyright</category><category>denmark</category><category>policy</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/sony-260000-deepfake-takedowns-indies</guid>
    <title>Sony has asked for 260,000 AI deepfakes to be taken down, and indie artists have no Sony</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/sony-260000-deepfake-takedowns-indies</link>
    <description>Sony Music has now asked platforms to remove more than 260,000 AI tracks imitating its artists, up from 135,000 at the end of March. That is roughly 20,000 requests a month, which is a full-time enforcement operation. An independent artist facing the same impersonation has a report form, a distributor and their own spare time.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>ai-music</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>sony-music</category><category>spotify</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/07/murphy-campbell-ai-voice-clone-uk-personality-rights</guid>
    <title>Murphy Campbell&#39;s AI clones show what a right to your voice can and can&#39;t fix</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/07/murphy-campbell-ai-voice-clone-uk-personality-rights</link>
    <description>AI covers built from North Carolina folk singer Murphy Campbell&#39;s YouTube performances appeared on streaming services under her name, then her own videos of public-domain songs were hit with copyright claims. The Musicians&#39; Union now uses her case to argue for UK personality rights. Her story suggests a right on paper is only the first of three things artists need.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>ai-music</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>personality-rights</category><category>uk</category><category>musicians-union</category><category>spotify</category><category>youtube</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/04/protect-name-face-youtube-likeness-spotify-profile-protection-isni</guid>
    <title>Protect your name and face: a setup guide to YouTube likeness detection, Spotify Artist Profile Protection and ISNI</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/04/protect-name-face-youtube-likeness-spotify-profile-protection-isni</link>
    <description>YouTube now offers likeness detection to talent agencies, managers and the celebrities they represent, as well as eligible creators. Spotify is beta-testing a way to review releases that use your name. Neither one travels across platforms, so here is how to set up both, and where an ISNI fits.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>youtube</category><category>spotify</category><category>deepfakes</category><category>isni</category><category>guides</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
