
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/brazil/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/brazil-ai-bill-pl-2338-training-opt-out-remuneration-stalled</guid>
    <title>Brazil&#39;s AI bill would let musicians block training and get paid, if the Chamber ever votes on it</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/10/brazil-ai-bill-pl-2338-training-opt-out-remuneration-stalled</link>
    <description>Brazil&#39;s Senate passed PL 2338/2023 in December 2024 with a copyright chapter that lets rightsholders forbid AI training on their work and requires AI developers to pay for what they use. The Chamber of Deputies&#39; special committee has held no meetings in 2026, and the rapporteur now expects a vote only after the October elections.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>artist-rights</category><category>ai</category><category>brazil</category><category>copyright</category><category>ai-training</category><category>regulation</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/brazil-ecad-letter-big-tech-ai-licensing-bill-stalled</guid>
    <title>Brazil&#39;s music societies told big tech to license now. The AI bill is still waiting</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/08/brazil-ecad-letter-big-tech-ai-licensing-bill-stalled</link>
    <description>ECAD, Brazil&#39;s central collecting office, and the music societies that run it joined broadcasters and publishers in a letter to OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon and others. It says AI use of their members&#39; work needs authorisation and payment under the 1998 copyright law, and invites talks to avoid litigation. Brazil&#39;s AI bill, which would write that into statute, has stalled in the Chamber of Deputies until after the elections.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai-music</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>copyright</category><category>collecting-societies</category><category>brazil</category><category>ecad</category><category>openai</category><category>pl-2338</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/brazil-mexico-spotify-royalties-2025-loud-and-clear</guid>
    <title>Brazil and Mexico on Spotify, by the royalty numbers: R$2bn, MX$8.2bn and who actually gets paid</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/05/brazil-mexico-spotify-royalties-2025-loud-and-clear</link>
    <description>Spotify says Brazilian artists generated about R$2bn on the service in 2025 and Mexican artists about MX$8.2bn. Both numbers are real growth, but they measure money paid to rights holders, not to artists, and Mexico&#39;s headline &quot;more than half from abroad&quot; is close to Spotify&#39;s own global average.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 05:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>industry</category><category>spotify</category><category>royalties</category><category>artist-rights</category><category>streaming</category><category>brazil</category><category>mexico</category><category>latin-america</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
