
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
      <title>We are the music makers</title>
      <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/latest</link>
      <description>Music tech and AI in music: the news that matters, what we think about it, and a directory of the tools.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://wearethemusicmakers.co/tags/benchmarks/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/ai-music-detectors-not-proof-artifactbench-benchmark</guid>
    <title>AI music detectors are not proof: what a benchmark of eight of them found</title>
    <link>https://wearethemusicmakers.co/news/2026/09/ai-music-detectors-not-proof-artifactbench-benchmark</link>
    <description>Intrect tested eight public AI music detectors on the same 2,104 files. The public Deezer research model flagged 13% of real tracks and caught 64.6% of AI ones, and two detectors flagged more than two-thirds of real music as AI. Vendors advertise 99%. Here is how to read the gap, and what to do if a score lands on your release.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>We are the music makers</dc:creator>
    <category>ai</category><category>ai-music</category><category>ai-detection</category><category>deezer</category><category>benchmarks</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
